Computer Science (arXiv)

A benchmark should deliver more than a scalar score: what makes an evaluation trustworthy is the reasoning that justifies the score. This is especially critical for world models, where judging a rollout requires understanding whether physics, causality, and world state evolve correctly. Humans spot such violations naturally, yet no existing benchmark automates this capability: metrics are computed brute-force, leaving no reasoning chain that can be examined or verified. We introduce HarnessEval-W, an agentified evaluation pipeline that brings the harness paradigm from the LLM ecosystem to world model benchmarking. Rather than applying a fixed rubric, HarnessEval-W interprets the context of each evaluation case, decomposes the evaluation question into measurable subproblems, and spawns specialized sub-agents, each equipped with tailored context and diagnostic tools to reason over its own subproblem. The parent agent then validates the gathered evidence and summarizes it into the final verdict. This hierarchical workflow turns every evaluation into a transparent evidence tree whose complete reasoning chain justifies the result. We apply HarnessEval-W to 18 representative world models over 330 evaluation cases. Its judgments closely align with human preferences while providing verifiable, fine-grained diagnoses of every generated rollout. We open-source the full pipeline as a live benchmark and invite the broad community to contribute to grow new skills and evaluation cases as world models evolve.

Time-critical interactive systems increasingly require ultra-low-latency device identification for multiple users, yet prevailing approaches such as passwords, QR codes, and RFID/NFC are constrained by human input, frame-based sensing, or near-contact range. This paper presents ECO-ID, an event-camera-based optical system for multi-user, ultra-low-latency identification over visible light communication (VLC). Leveraging microsecond-resolution, asynchronous observations of brightness transitions, ECO-ID employs a spatiotemporal coding design: disjoint LED subsets provide spatial separation among users, while user-specific timing delays encode identities without inter-user synchronization. The optical channel and event-driven sensing reduce full-scene capture relative to frame cameras and limit the RF attack surface, while enabling rapid token verification with freshness and replay protection. We implement a prototype and demonstrate that ECO-ID can practically achieve approximately 99.8\% localization and 98.7\% identification with 0.64 ms mean latency, while theoretically supporting identification at the scale of tens of concurrent users. Overall, ECO-ID provides a fast, privacy-conscious, and security-aware alternative for scalable multi-user identification in time-critical interactive environments.

We prove a fault-tolerance theorem for quantum computation against adversarial noise. For every quantum circuit on $\bar{N}$ logical qudits of depth $\bar{T}$, we construct a fault-tolerant circuit on $N=\text{poly}(\bar{N})$ physical qudits of depth $\bar{T}\cdot\bar{N}^{o(1)}$, which is robust against an adversary who may arbitrarily choose and corrupt an almost-linear number $N^{1-o(1)}$ of physical qudits at each time step. This robustness significantly improves upon prior fault-tolerance theorems, which assumed corruptions were either local and stochastic, or else only act on a polynomially vanishing fraction of qudits. Our fault-tolerance scheme addresses a key bottleneck towards constructing quantum PCPs via the circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping of Anshu, Breuckmann, and Nguyen (STOC'24). More fundamentally, our result demonstrates that fault-tolerant quantum computation remains possible under noise models that are global, worst-case, and non-Markovian over the full duration of the computation, directly countering concerns that correlated noise could fundamentally undermine quantum fault tolerance. Our construction is based on a new family of subsystem product codes we develop, which have large dimension and distance along with low-weight parity-checks, and which support transversal non-Clifford gates. We show how to perform single-shot fault-tolerant error correction on these codes using a Floquet-like procedure based on the local testability of classical tensor codes. We then obtain a universal fault-tolerance scheme using repeated code switching in a hypercubic qudit architecture. Finally, we recursively compose our scheme with itself to reduce an initially exponential qudit dimension down to a constant.

Decentralized lending lacks a credit bureau: a borrower's capacity to repay must be inferred entirely from public on-chain activity, without income verification or a liability record. This paper presents zLend, a deployed cash-flow underwriting framework that reconstructs a wallet's daily balance history from raw token transfers and derives short-duration repayment-capacity signals from it. The reconstruction is performed twice per wallet, once restricted to a fixed stablecoin basket and once over all fungible transfers, on the premise that a wallet's total token holdings and its liquid, spendable balance are distinct quantities whose conflation misprices risk. From each series we derive liquidity coverage against a fixed loan size, cash-flow volatility and regularity, a drawdown-and-recovery statistic adapted from quantitative finance, and a recurring-counterparty detector that identifies salary-like payment cadence from transfer timing alone. The two views are then compared: a wallet with large aggregate holdings whose stablecoin reserve rarely covers the loan size is flagged as a liquidity mismatch irrespective of total wealth. We specify the pipeline formally, document the golden-master methodology used to verify a cross-language production migration to numerical tolerance 1e-9, and characterize the tier function's parameter sensitivity with an independent reimplementation validated to exact agreement (78 of 78 field assertions) against the deployed system's reference fixtures. Tier assignment is governed predominantly by the reference loan size, with four of six reference wallets changing tier across loan sizes from USD 10 to USD 25,000; the drawdown and coverage criteria bind on disjoint wallets, so neither subsumes the other; and no criterion in the tier rule is inert. zLend is deployed in production, informing real lending decisions via third-party API integrations.

Background Lung cancer remains the deadliest cancer worldwide because it is often diagnosed too late. Effective treatment depends on detection at an early screening stage. However, the growing number of patients and the limited number of radiologists lead to prolonged diagnostic waiting times. In very early stage lung cancer, nodule visibility is further reduced by adjacent blood vessels and airway walls, because nodules are often connected to or supplied by these structures. Task-specific analysis of the bronchovascular bundle is therefore important for efficient nodule detection, and its removal can increase the diagnostic potential of lung cancer screening. Materials and Methods To assess the efficacy of the proposed method, we used series from widely utilized LDCT datasets, including the Duke Lung Cancer Screening (DLCS) dataset and the Pilot Pomeranian Lung Cancer Screening Program. The proposed bronchovascular bundle segmentation pipeline, RONALD, operates on computed tomography images and returns binary masks of vessels and bronchi located in the lung parenchyma. The method includes a preprocessing stage with lung, lobe, and mediastinum segmentation, followed by separate vessel and bronchial tree segmentation. Results The proposed pipeline segmented the bronchovascular bundle in low-dose computed tomography scans while improving nodule retention compared with other segmentation methods: from 93.98% and 90.36% to 100% in DLCS, and from 83.16% and 62.36% to 99.92% in the Pomeranian dataset. Conclusion The resulting segmentations can improve lung nodule detection in the very early stages of lung cancer.

We show that, on trees, any locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) $Π$ that can be solved by an $n^{o(1)}$-dependent distribution can also be solved by an $O(\log n)$-round deterministic LOCAL algorithm. The result is obtained through a rake-and-compress-style decomposition of the input tree, and local simulations of the bounded dependent distribution on the components of the decomposition. As a corollary to our result, any LCL problem on trees can either be solved by an $O(\log n)$ deterministic LOCAL algorithm, or requires $n^{Ω(1)}$ rounds to solve by a quantum-LOCAL algorithm.

Multi-segment suction-based soft robots are promising for inspection and maintenance in confined or fragile environments, but existing approaches still depend heavily on manually designed gaits and environment-specific motion scripts. This work presents a planning framework for serial multi-segment soft robots with deformable body segments and boundary suction pads. The formulation targets full 3D navigation on complex surfaces and explicitly handles discrete adhesion switching and continuous body deformation under geometric, collision, and quasi-static feasibility constraints, while remaining agnostic to the specific actuation realization used to produce segment deformation. Its core, block-wise IK hybrid search (IKHS), performs best-first search over feasible adhesion transitions while solving inverse kinematics only on induced free blocks. On top of IKHS, primitive-augmented hybrid search (PaHS) uses a learned observation--primitive embedding to retrieve short validated motion segments for fast local proposal, with fallback to standard IKHS branching when retrieval fails. In simulation, the framework consistently outperforms controlled baselines in planning success, transition quality, and efficiency across diverse terrains. PaHS matches IKHS in success rate while substantially reducing planning time. Repeated hardware experiments on a pneumatic multi-segment soft robot further demonstrate executability and online recovery under actuation and adhesion uncertainty.

Regulatory compliance monitoring in deployed language models is increasingly implemented as a legal and audit control, checking model outputs against written rules spanning data protection, healthcare, financial regulation, and platform policy. Such monitoring is meaningful only if a detector's verdict depends on the stated rule rather than on surface features of the scenario. We show this condition fails across the current class of compliance detectors, a failure we call rule blindness. Deleting, permuting, or substituting the governing rule leaves detection accuracy unchanged for every guard and activation probe we test, including a policy-conditioned guard that correctly cites the governing clause yet barely changes its verdict when that clause is swapped for its permissive counterpart. A purpose-built benchmark crossing two rules with two scenarios, so that neither alone predicts the label, confirms the failure under a design no prior benchmark rules out, and shows that step by step reasoning, not any fast detector we test, is what escapes it. Auditing at scale requires a retraining-free detector, so we introduce the Internal Compliance Score (ICS): a training-free activation readout calibrated from ten labelled pairs and scored by a single projection. We hold ICS to the same scrutiny as the guards it audits: a pre-registered criterion for beating trivial baselines is not met, and a bag-of-words model matches its pooled generalisation exactly. It remains useful because it is inexpensive, letting us audit four deployed guard models, an 8B zero-shot judge, and thirteen benchmarks, and it raises the mechanically verified pass rate when used to rank candidate responses, though an adaptive white-box attack removes this gain. We release the counterfactual protocol and crossed-rule benchmark so rule blindness can be tested in future probe and guard claims.

Differentiable triangle-soup reconstruction inherits a limitation from its objective: photometric and geometric losses cannot measure topology, so a reconstruction with a collapsed loop or a punctured enclosed void can score exactly as well as a correct one (on Chamfer-equal probes the diagrams differ 35-40x in bottleneck distance). The standard implicit remedy -- steer *where* the resampler spends its budget -- does not repair this: in a controlled study, a topology-informed prior is largely matched by an equally wide random one, and no prior shape repairs loops. We therefore move topology into the objective: a differentiable persistence term compares the evolving surface's diagram, measured on live surface samples, to a fixed target; gradients flow through a pair-frozen backward re-expressing matched birth/death simplices as closed-form circumradii, plus a recruitment term restoring the gradient optimal matching provably lacks when a feature is missing; one ratio knob calibrates the loss against the photometric gradient, no curriculum needed. Every claim passes a channel-controlled verdict: the loss must beat a norm-matched *non-topological* control through the identical gradient channel, at Chamfer parity. Under that rule the loss is topology-specific for enclosed voids (4.0-7.9x lower error) and -- the class every allocation prior failed -- for loops (2.3x, zero phantom handles, while the control collapses one); loss and prior compose; component counts (H0) are a null result. The verdicts replicate without per-shape tuning on eight external genus-known meshes in two pre-registered groups (group means: loops 1.52x, voids 4.87x; the one non-pass is a no-headroom null), degrading gracefully under noise. All evidence is synthetic and single-machine, with the target diagram known in advance; real scans are future work. Prescription: correct topology in the loss, allocate wide, combine.

The quadratic cost of attention-based sequence models for long contexts has motivated a growing line of research on memory-based models that can compress context into a compact state. However, most existing memory models expose a static memory throughout the entire sequence. Because early tokens face no compression pressure, they occupy too many degrees of freedom and "pollute" the memory state, leaving little capacity for later context and increasing interference between what is stored and what arrives next. We study a new paradigm of incremental memory activation, where the effective capacity of memory is progressively expanded as the context grows. Imposing an early bottleneck forces the model to compress history more effectively, while unlocking fresh capacity over time reduces interference and improves retention of later context. We instantiate this paradigm in Proteus, a straightforward mechanism that can be incorporated into a broad class of neural memory architectures at no additional cost. We apply Proteus to state-of-the-art models, including SWLA, Comba, Titans, and Hope-Attention, and observe consistent improvements on standard language modeling and reasoning, as well as on long-context retrieval and understanding, with gains that grow at longer context lengths. Overall, our results show that static memory is suboptimal and that scheduling effective capacity is a simple and broadly applicable tool for sequence modeling.

Foundation models are increasingly used for perception, reasoning, planning, and action generation in embodied agents, creating security risks that can propagate from digital inputs to physical behavior. Existing surveys often organize threats by mechanisms such as jailbreaks, prompt injection, backdoors, poisoning, or adversarial examples, but these categories do not consistently identify where an adversary first enters the embodied control loop. We present a trust-boundary-centric survey of foundation-model-powered embodied-agent security. Using a first-compromised-trust-boundary principle, we separate attack surface from attack mechanism and organize the system into five layers and twelve attack surfaces spanning the model supply chain, user instructions, context and memory, physical semantic environments, multimodal perception, world state, internal reasoning, task planning, action interfaces, middleware, multi-agent communication, and execution control. Based on 58 attack records and 61 defense records collected through August 15, 2026, we analyze representative attacks, cross-layer propagation, defense placement, and evaluation practices. Our quantitative analysis shows that attack research is concentrated on multimodal perception and action interfaces, while defenses are especially concentrated on action-level and runtime protection. Context and long-term memory, middleware and networking, world-state integrity, and multi-agent trust remain comparatively underexplored. We conclude with open challenges in state provenance, compositional defenses, long-horizon attack propagation, physical realizability, Byzantine multi-robot behavior, and unified closed-loop evaluation.

Turning a frontier vision-language model into a robot policy usually means fine-tuning it to emit an action representation it never saw in pretraining, which throws away much of the reasoning that made the model worth reaching for. We go the other way and keep the VLM frozen. It writes the policy as a short Python control function, with no demonstrations and no fine-tuning. Writing that code once is open-loop, though. Existing closed-loop methods react at the wrong level: they retry a fixed policy or pick a different subtask, but never rewrite the code that failed. VLCP closes the loop where the failure actually lives, on the control code, within a single episode. Every $K$ steps the VLM re-observes the scene from multi-view RGB, proprioceptive state, and a state delta, then rewrites the control function from what it just saw, so a failure is caught before it compounds. We evaluate on a 57-task MuJoCo/RoboVerse sweep. This training-free policy reaches $35.1\%$ pooled success, against $3.5\%$ for the identical system queried once per episode. That tenfold gap holds with non-overlapping confidence intervals in every scene family. The gain traces to a $27.3\%$ within-episode recovery rate on failed grasps: a miss an open-loop controller would carry to the end of the episode gets re-observed and fixed at the next replan. And the loop stays cheap. A median $84\%$ of input tokens hit cache, an episode needs only about $10$ compact queries, and control blocks written during any replan persist to a cross-episode skill library reused in later prompts.

In this very short paper, we present a measurement-driven analysis of the security characteristics of Starlink-connected hosts and uncover several concerning trends. We find that Starlink hosts are more likely to run outdated or vulnerable operating systems and network protocols than non-Starlink hosts. Regions like Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Eastern Europe show disproportionately higher risk. Our findings raise important questions for the Internet measurement and policy communities.

Peer prediction seeks to incentivize agents to truthfully report an observed signal by rewarding joint sets of reports without observing a ground truth. Following the generalization of information-theoretic mutual information introduced in Kong and Schoenebeck (2019), we call a function of a joint distribution over signals a mutual information when it is non-negative and disincentivizes garbling reports for all information structures. An unbiased estimator for a mutual information takes some number of samples from the distribution and returns rewards for both agents, such that the expected reward is equal to the mutual information. We seek to characterize the set of mutual informations with unbiased estimators for a given number of samples. We show that for three or fewer sampled report pairs, the only mutual information with an unbiased estimator is trivially zero, and for four or five samples with a binary report space, the Determinant Mutual Information (DMI) of Kong (2024) is the unique mutual information (up to a scalar multiple). We further show that DMI ceases to be unique at six samples. We provide an improved estimator of DMI for any given number of samples and characterize its convergence rate. We also examine mutual information estimators that accept a randomized number of samples. First, we show that mutual information estimators on an ex-ante bounded number of samples (termed "stop-short estimators") can achieve a lower variance than an equivalent fixed-sample estimator (for DMI). Second, we introduce the class of scoring-rule-based mutual informations and identify in this family a mutual information that can be estimated with under three samples in expectation.

Humanoid robots hold great promise as general-purpose agents in human-centered environments, yet generalist vision-language-action (VLA) foundation models are not readily applicable to humanoid whole-body loco-manipulation. The high dimensionality and interdependence of humanoid motions make it challenging for conventional single-stage VLA architectures to coordinate locomotion, waist posture, and dual-arm manipulation effectively. Moreover, policies trained through offline behavior cloning can remain suboptimal during real-world deployment. Although online reinforcement learning can refine policies through real-world interaction, directly tuning large VLA backbones demands excessive computation and may introduce safety risks during real-robot exploration. To address these bottlenecks, we introduce HAF (Humanoid Adaptation Framework), a two-part framework consisting of HAF-VLA and HAF-Steer that transfers off-the-shelf generalist VLA foundation models to humanoid whole-body loco-manipulation. HAF-VLA is a hierarchical action-flow generator built on a pretrained flow-matching VLA. It splits full-body action denoising into three sequential stages with stage embeddings and cross-stage KV caches that retain kinematic dependencies, avoiding incoherent whole-body actions from one-shot generation. On top of the frozen HAF-VLA, HAF-Steer is a latent offline-to-online RL pipeline that leverages flow-matching invertibility and DCT-based dimensionality reduction to restrict RL optimization to a compact noise subspace and train a regularized SAC policy. This avoids updating the large VLA backbone and enables efficient real-world policy refinement. Evaluated on seven real-world humanoid loco-manipulation tasks, HAF surpasses vanilla single-stage VLA baselines and improves whole-body coordination and task performance. Project website: https://grange007.github.io/HAF .

We demonstrate that AI models are broadly susceptible to a phenomenon we call model hypnosis, in which individually weak and seemingly irrelevant cues in the prompt can be systematically combined to strongly control model behavior. Model hypnosis occurs across model families and scales, including in frontier reasoning models, and hypnotic prompts can transfer between models. Because the model is controlled by inconspicuous textual choices, such as paraphrases and typos, model hypnosis presents new challenges and avenues for AI safety, and is a major hurdle for AI interpretability.

AI systems are increasingly capable of contributing to mathematical research. In research practice, frontier-model reasoning is a limited resource, and expert mathematical review is even more sharply constrained. Allocating these scarce resources well is therefore central to making AI-assisted mathematical discovery efficient. In most current AI-for-math workflows, human effort is concentrated at the beginning and end, in selecting suitable research problems and later reviewing the resulting artifacts. These two stages are becoming bottlenecks for research-level mathematics. We address them by proposing a new human-AI discovery paradigm. The human input is no longer a single problem selected in advance, but a research direction in which the experts have interest and expertise. The system then searches a broad literature corpus for candidate problems in that direction. Inspired by search and recommender systems, we build Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering. In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline starts from 5,245 combinatorics papers, recovers 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, and filters them to 4,717 apparently well-posed and still-open conjectures. Subsequent reasoning and automated triage stages surface 598 potential resolutions and select 77 items for author-team review. Among them, we identify many interesting discoveries, including results on conjectures and questions of Davies--Jenssen--Perkins--Roberts, Erdős--Straus, Ikenmeyer--Pak--Panova, and Lund--Saraf--Wolf. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new mode of human-AI collaboration for mathematical discovery.

Ship fuel consumption (SFC) prediction supports vessel operation optimisation, emissions estimation, and decision support systems (DSS) for sustainable maritime transportation. Numerous data-driven fuel models have been developed over the past two decades, but a critical and often overlooked limitation lies in their validation practices: most studies evaluate performance using random train--test splits, which, applied to high-frequency records, admit temporal leakage and yield optimistic results that do not reflect deployment conditions. This paper examines that gap using time-aware evaluation, specifically Time Series Cross-Validation (TSCV) and Blocked TSCV (BTSCV). Using the Canadian Coast Guard Ship (CCGS) \textit{Sir Wilfrid Laurier} as a case study, six regression models and a physics baseline are tuned under three time-aware schemes and three feature configurations, then evaluated on a common chronological hold-out set drawn from approximately 3.88 million steady-state 1\,Hz records.

Generative pretraining established reusable task representations; later work on language-based task conditioning and in-context learning showed that a fixed model could adapt its behavior from instructions and demonstrations. Policy Iteration with Human Feedback (PIHF) builds on this development and the recurrent evaluate-and-improve structure of generalized policy iteration. PIHF uses a pretrained language model as its execution substrate and moves persistent revision to a versioned natural-language policy and tool set. A language-model critic and clinical expert review complete-panel reasoning and tool-use trajectories to localize recurrent failures and form candidate revisions; the expert may reinterpret the evidence and retains authority over admission and rollback, while Recall@1 and Recall@5 validate outcomes after candidate execution. Across cumulative ablations and ultra-rare-disease benchmarks, a PIHF-derived policy improved Recall@1 in one proprietary executor and three open-weight executors spanning 3 to 49 billion active parameters. Gains were 32.7 percentage points for GPT-5.4 and 31.1 points for Qwen3.6-35B, a difference of 1.7 points. These results support the feasibility of using pretrained language models as fixed-weight execution substrates for expert-guided policy development in rare-disease diagnosis.

Video world models approximate the stochastic distribution of physical outcomes through generative sampling, but existing benchmarks score individual generations or compare distributions coarsely over a whole dataset, leaving the fine-grained aleatoric uncertainty of specific phenomena untested. We introduce CaliBench, which scores outcomes in a physically interpretable discrete space - a bin index, a die face, a suit, a colour - rather than a learned feature space such as in FID, so the distance from a known reference distribution is measured directly. We curate outcome spaces whose reference is known in closed form (binomial Galton boards, Bernoulli forks, uniform dice/cards/lottery, a skewed European-roulette colour), enabling an exact calibration test. We decompose performance into two orthogonal axes that a single accuracy metric conflates: scorability, the fraction of generations yielding a scoreable outcome, and calibration, the total variation distance from the reference on that sample. A chi-squared test assesses significance; as calibration is its null hypothesis it can evidence only miscalibration, and at N=32 per cell detects only large deviations. We apply it to nine scenes and six image-to-video models (WAN-2.7, SeeDance-2.0, HappyHorse-1.0, Veo 3.1, Runway Gen-4.5, Cosmos3-Super), 32 generations each. Models consistently concentrate probability mass on a few outcomes rather than reproducing the reference. Most scene-model combinations are significantly miscalibrated, in the extreme collapsing to one outcome, as Veo 3.1 does on dice. On roulette, generations often leave the ball ambiguously placed, giving several models low scorability. Performance varies by scene: no model dominates all nine. We release the protocol and a metric (mean normalised total variation, mnTV) for comparing new models against our results.

High-Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) operate in the lower stratosphere at 17-27 km, between satellites and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). For this third tier the architectural case has long outpaced the flight evidence, but a wave of 2020-2026 stratospheric flights now permits a direct comparison. We evaluate HAPS function by function across sensing, navigation, and communication, taking operational satellite and UAV implementations as the reference. We define a strict evidence rule, counting a function as flight-validated only on operationally relevant stratospheric data return at or above 18 km, and apply it to nineteen functions. The resulting count is lower than the literature implies: five functions have credibly crossed over (optical Earth observation, hyperspectral imaging, methane imaging, RF/SIGINT, and broadband relay), yet these rest on only four flight programs, with at most one carrying peer-reviewed flight evidence. One function is ground-demonstrated, two are partially demonstrated, three are conceptual, and eight remain unflown. Four engineering domains (size, weight, and power; station-keeping; aperture; and viewing geometry), bounded by an operational envelope of platform stability and payload operability, explain the pattern. The governing advantage is persistence at close range, not altitude. Eight use cases, supported by same-sensor forward simulations, translate the pattern into missions, led by resilient public-safety mission-critical services (MCX). On this evidence, HAPS fits as a persistent regional tier in a multi-tier non-terrestrial network and as the seed of an emerging High Altitude Economy. Carrier-grade service, station-keeping precision, and regulation remain the principal open problems, and we pose the persistent-tier reading as a testable hypothesis with dated 2030 markers.

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) modifies web content to increase its likelihood of being selected and cited by generative search engines. This can give strategically optimized pages visibility disproportionate to their authority or relevance and even make weak or false information appear well supported. Unlike conventional search, generative search synthesizes information into direct answers rather than presenting competing sources, which can further amplify these risks, as assessing source provenance and authority requires additional user interaction. Despite these concerns, systematic methods for detecting GEO-optimized webpages remain underexplored. We introduce \texttt{GEOFlagBench}, a benchmark of 3,200 webpages spanning 400 queries, four domains, and eight GEO optimizer families, and use it to systematically evaluate existing GEO detection methods. Although the strongest baseline achieves an aggregate F1 of 0.880, method-level and authorship-conditioned evaluations reveal substantial weaknesses and potential reliance on authorship-related shortcuts. We therefore propose \emph{Intervention-Paired Training} (IPT), which supervises detector responses to GEO interventions and non-GEO AI polishing; on ModernBERT, IPT improves F1 from 0.862 to 0.944 and worst-group accuracy from 0.725 to 0.883. We develop a GEO-gated Agent system for auditing the Source Tier and verifiability of Citation URLs in detected GEO pages. Finally, we deploy the complete pipeline on released Google Search and Gemini-grounded retrieval results for 1,000 real-user queries. Across 10,095 available pages, we estimate an overall GEO prevalence of 8.90\%, reaching 16.36\% among pages modified in 2026. Our results establish a foundation for systematically detecting, auditing, and measuring GEO in real-world search ecosystems.

The Central Place Foraging Algorithm (CPFA) combines site fidelity, pheromone-guided navigation, and uninformed random search to enable decentralized resource collection in robot swarms. However, CPFA often revisits previously explored regions while leaving other areas insufficiently searched, reducing efficiency as resources become scarce. In this paper, we propose Adaptive Repulsive Pheromone Clustering (ARPC), a bio-inspired method in which robots deposit repulsive pheromone waypoints to mark previously explored locations. These waypoints are clustered around the nest to estimate low-value search regions, allowing robots to be redirected toward likely unvisited areas. By integrating the exploitation of known resources with systematic avoidance of redundant exploration, ARPC improves search diversity and resource discovery efficiency. Extensive simulations in ARGoS across varying arena sizes, resource densities, and clustered, random, and power-law spatial distributions demonstrate that ARPC consistently outperforms CPFA and the Grid-Based CPFA (GPFA). In particular, ARPC yields significant gains during both early discovery (10\%) and late-stage (up to 60\%) collection, where conventional methods typically degrade. These results indicate that ARPC provides a scalable and robust strategy for large-scale heterogeneous swarm foraging environments.

Prediction market platforms present contracts about future events through visualizations that show probabilities, prices, trends, odds, and payout information. Although these visualizations often appear precise, they do not always show uncertainty directly. As a result, users infer uncertainty from market movement, visualization cues, and contextual information. In this paper, we examine how users interpret prediction market visualizations through a qualitative analysis of posts and comments from the Reddit community r/Kalshi. From an initial corpus of approximately 12,000 posts and 96,000 comments, we identified 360 posts containing prediction market visualizations and conducted a thematic analysis of annotated posts and related discussions. Our findings show that users infer uncertainty through several forms of interpretation: they interpret chart values, struggle with probability information displayed, bring in external knowledge, question credibility and liquidity, critique visualization design, and connecting visualized information to betting decisions.

Agents now write knowledge graphs, but knowledge-graph stores still carry defaults set when humans curated them: accept writes now and clean later, keep one time axis or none, treat every writer's facts as equally trustworthy, and leave governance to dashboards and middleware. These four defaults are individually convenient and jointly untenable under agent workloads. We present Quipu, an embeddable store that inverts all four: no fact enters except through a gate whose predicates evaluate the pending post-state; data, trust labels, verdicts, and the rules themselves are bitemporal; named graphs are the unit of authority and trust, composed under a lattice whose one invariant is that composition never widens; and the governance specification $Σ$, the trace, and signed verdicts are facts in the store they govern, making the audit $T \models Σ$ a query. We evaluate with Census, a deterministic multi-writer lifecycle whose single seeded run scores every research question against planted ground truth: the gated store ends with 0 of 6 planted defects versus 6 of 6 ungated; all 7 composition probes uphold the lattice contract; 50 of 50 satisfied verdicts re-derive faithfully as of their instant while all 50 would be misreported under a latest-only rule set; and the SARC reference checker agrees with the in-store audit verdict-for-verdict, differing only on coverage semantics. A recorded trace from a governed writer surfaces a live enforcement gap the audit names with its remediation. On DEMM-Bench, an external decision-evidence sufficiency benchmark, a content-only reading of the exported records answers all 512 property-level governance questions correctly with zero overclaim under all eight degradation conditions, while container-presence baselines overclaim on up to 87.5% of them -- and the run surfaced, and led us to close, a gap in what a denial's verdict attests.